“WHAT’S FOREIGN IS BETTER”: A FUZZY AHP ANALYSIS TO EVALUATE FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE FOREIGN PRODUCT CHOICE AMONG INDIAN CONSUMERS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Emerging economies across the globe have observed drastic changes in consumer purchasing behavior in the last three decades. This has been attributed to rapid globalization, coupled with technological advancement that has led to consumer affinity towards foreign brands. In this paper an attempt has been made to understand this affinity towards foreign brands across product categories. We used the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to evaluate the factors that influence foreign product purchasing behavior among Indian consumers. A set of five important influencing factors were identified and responses from over 100 Indian consumers were collected across five product categories (automobiles, home appliances, apparel, cosmetics and watches). It was found that for apparel, watches and cosmetics, perceived quality of the brand/product was the most valued attribute. Whereas, for home appliances the country of origin mattered the most, and for watches perceived quality as well as country of manufacture were equally important. The findings of this study will help shape marketing strategies for foreign brands trying to make inroads or gain market share in emerging markets like India
How to Cite
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP); Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); Foreign products, Foreign product purchasing behavior, Foreign brands
Arora, A. S., Arora, A., & Taras, V. (2019). The moderating role of culture in social media-based spatial imagery, consumer xenocentrism, and word-of-mouth for global virtual teams. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 19(2), 160-193. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595819856379
Ayhan, M. B. (2013). A Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection problem: A sase study in a gear motor company. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains (IJMVSC), 4(3), 11-23. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmvsc.2013.4302
Badri, M. A., & Abdulla, M. H. (2004). Awards of excellence in institutions of higher education: an AHP approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4), 224-242. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540410538813
Balabanis, G., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2004). Domestic country bias, country-of-origin effects, and consumer ethnocentrism: a multidimensional unfolding approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 80-95. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.15.0138
Balabanis, G., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2016). Consumer xenocentrism as determinant of foreign product preference: A system justification perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 24(3), 58-77. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.15.0138
Balabanis, G., & Siamagka, N. T. (2017). Inconsistencies in the behavioural effects of consumer ethnocentrism: The role of brand, product category and country of origin. International Marketing Review, 34(2), 166-182. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-03-2015-0057
Batra, R., Ramaswamy, V., Alden, D. L., Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Ramachander, S. (2000). Effects of brand local and nonlocal origin on consumer attitudes in developing countries. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(2), 83-95. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0902_3
Bawa, A. (2004). Consumer ethnocentrism: CETSCALE validation and measurement of extent. Vikalpa, 29(3), 43-58. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920040304
Bilkey, W. J., & Nes, E. (1982). Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1), 89-100. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490539
Bhaskaran, S., & Sukumaran, N. (2007). Contextual and methodological issues in COO studies. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 25(1), 66-81. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500710722407
Brown, J. S., & Hagel III, J. (2005). Disruptive management. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 34.
Buckley, J.J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(1), 233–247. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
Buckley, J.J. (1990). Fuzzy eigenvalues and input-output analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 34(2), 187-195. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(90)90158-3
Buckley, J.J., Feuring, T., & Hayashi, Y. (2001). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1), 48-64. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00405-1
Business Today (2017). 10 brands that sound international but are actually Indian - Photos-1. Retrieved 9 January 2020, from https://www.businesstoday.in/photos/in-the-news/10-brands-that-sound-international-but-are-actually-indian/1203.html
Costa, C., Carneiro, J., & Goldszmidt, R. (2016). A contingent approach to country-of-origin effects on foreign products evaluation: Interaction of facets of country image with product classes. International Business Review, 25(5), 1066-1075. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.01.003
Diamantopoulos, A., Davydova, O., & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, M. (2019). Modeling the role of consumer xenocentrism in impacting preferences for domestic and foreign brands: A mediation analysis. Journal of Business Research, 104, 587-596. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.007
Donadio, R. (2010). Chinese remake the ‘Made in Italy’ fashion label. New York Times, 12.
Economic Times (2017). 50 global retailers to enter India in 6 months - Retail Wave. [online] The Economic Times. Available at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/retail/50-global-retailers-to-enter-india-in-6-months/india-the-most-promising-retail-market/slideshow/59233635.cms [Accessed 5 Jan. 2020].
Economic Times. Cosmetics market to grow by 25% to $20 billion by 2025. (2020). Retrieved 8 January 2020, from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/cons-products/fmcg/cosmetics-market-to-grow-by-25-to-20-billion-by-2025/articleshow/62838360.cms
Elliott, G. R., & Cameron, R. C. (1994). Consumer perception of product quality and the country-of-origin effect. Journal of International Marketing, 2(2), 49-62.
Fan, Y. (2010). Branding the nation: Towards a better understanding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 6(2), 97-103. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2010.16
Fischer, P. M., & Zeugner-Roth, K. P. (2017). Disentangling country-of-origin effects: the interplay of product ethnicity, national identity, and consumer ethnocentrism. Marketing Letters, 28(2), 189-204. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-016-9400-7
Forman, E., & Peniwati, K. (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 108(1), 165-169. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(97)00244-0
Ganguly, A., & Merino, D. N. (2015). An integrated AHP-QFD approach for evaluating competing technological processes. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 7(3), 539-559. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v7i3.315
Ganguly, A., & Kumar, C. (2019). Evaluating supply chain resiliency strategies in the Indian pharmaceutical sector: a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) approach. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 11(2), 153-180. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v11i2.620
Ger, G., & Belk, R. W. (1996). Cross-cultural differences in materialism. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(1), 55-77. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(95)00035-6
Giridhar, V., Joshi, R., & Sadarangani, P. H. (2016). Purchase intentions of consumer towards foreign brand apparel: Evidences from India. In Designing and Implementing Global Supply Chain Management (pp. 185-209). IGI Global. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9720-1.ch010
Godey, B., Pederzoli, D., Aiello, G., Donvito, R., Chan, P., Oh, H., ... & Weitz, B. (2012). Brand and country-of-origin effect on consumers' decision to purchase luxury products. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1461-1470. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.012
Goyal, P., Rahman, Z., & Kazmi, A. A. (2015). Identification and prioritization of corporate sustainability practices using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Modelling in Management, 10(1), 23-49. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-09-2012-0030
Guo, X. (2013). Living in a global world: Influence of consumer global orientation on attitudes toward global brands from developed versus emerging countries. Journal of International Marketing, 21(1), 1-22. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.12.0065
Halkias, G., Davvetas, V., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2016). The interplay between country stereotypes and perceived brand globalness/localness as drivers of brand preference. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3621-3628. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.022
Han, C. M., & Terpstra, V. (1988). Country-of-origin effects for uni-national and bi-national products. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(2), 235-255. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490379
Hsu, C. L., Chang, C. Y., & Yansritakul, C. (2017). Exploring purchase intention of green skincare products using the theory of planned behavior: Testing the moderating effects of country of origin and price sensitivity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 145-152. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.10.006
Ismail, Z., Masood, S., & Tawab, Z. M. (2012). Factors affecting consumer preference of international brands over local brands. 2nd International Conference on Social Science and Humanity, Chennai, India, March 10.
Iyer, G. R., & Kalita, J. K. (1997). The impact of country-of-origin and country-of-manufacture cues on consumer perceptions of quality and value. Journal of Global Marketing, 11(1), 7-28. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/j042v11n01_02
Jain, S. K., & Jain, R. (2013). Consumer ethnocentrism and its antecedents: An exploratory study of consumers in India. Asian Journal of Business Research, 3(1), 1-18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.130001
James, D. (2005). Guilty through association: brand association transfer to brand alliances. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(1), 14-24. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760510576518
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system?justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
Kahraman, C. (2018). A brief literature review for Fuzzy AHP. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 10(2), 293-297.
Kaynak, E., & Kara, A. (2002). Consumer perceptions of foreign products: An analysis of product-country images and ethnocentrism. European Journal of Marketing, 36(7/8), 928-949. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560210430881
Kent, D. P., & Burnight, R. G. (1951). Group centrism in complex societies. American Journal of Sociology, 57(3), 256-259. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/220943
Khan, H., Bamber, D., & Quazi, A. (2012). Relevant or redundant: Elite consumers' perception of foreign-made products in an emerging market. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(9-10), 1190-1216. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2011.635153
Kinra, N. (2006). The effect of country-of-origin on foreign brand names in the Indian market. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 24(1), 15-30. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500610641534
Koh, N. S., Hu, N., & Clemons, E. K. (2010). Do online reviews reflect a product’s true perceived quality? An investigation of online movie reviews across cultures. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(5), 374-385. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.04.001
Koubaa, Y., Methamem, R. B., & Fort, F. (2015). Multidimensional structures of brand and country images, and their effects on product evaluation. International Journal of Market Research, 57(1), 95-124. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2501/ijmr-2015-007
Kumar, A., Fairhurst, A., & Kim, Y. K. (2011). Ethnocentric tendencies of Indian consumers: impact on preference for domestic versus foreign products. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 21(4), 323-341. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2011.595496
Kumar, D., & Rahman, Z. (2017). Analyzing enablers of sustainable supply chain: ISM and fuzzy AHP approach. Journal of Modelling in Management, 12(3), 498-524. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-02-2016-0013
Kurtulus, K., & Bozbay, Z. (2015). Exploring country of manufacture effect on strong and weak brands. In Marketing in Transition: Scarcity, Globalism, and Sustainability (pp. 407-411). Springer, Cham. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18687-0_151
Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B. H., & Dubé, L. (1994). Foreign branding and its effects on product perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 263-270. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379403100209
Lee, J., & Nguyen, M. J. (2017). Product attributes and preference for foreign brands among Vietnamese consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 35, 76-83. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.12.001
Leung, L. C., & Cao, D. (2000). On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 124(1), 102–113. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00118-6
Macharis, C., Springael, J., De Brucker, K., & Verbeke, A. (2004). PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 307-317. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00153-x
Maher, A. A., & Carter, L. L. (2011). The affective and cognitive components of country image: Perceptions of American products in Kuwait. International Marketing Review, 28(6), 559-580. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331111181411
Melnyk, V., Klein, K., & Völckner, F. (2012). The double-edged sword of foreign brand names for companies from emerging countries. Journal of Marketing, 76(6), 21-37. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0349
Mockaitis, A. I., Salciuviene, L., & Ghauri, P. N. (2013). On what do consumer product preferences depend? Determining domestic versus foreign product preferences in an emerging economy market. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 25(3), 166-180. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2013.780456
Nes, E., & Bilkey, W. J. (1993). A multi-cue test of country-of-origin theory. In N. Papadopoulos, L. Heslop (Eds), Product-country images: Impact and role in international marketing (179-195). Routledge.
Oguzitimur, S., (2011). Why fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach for transport problems? European Regional Science Association ERSA Conference, Vienna, Austria.
Özsomer, A. (2012). The interplay between global and local brands: A closer look at perceived brand globalness and local iconness. Journal of International Marketing, 20(2), 72-95. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.11.0105
Papadopoulos, N., & Heslop, L. A. (2014). Product-country images: Impact and role in international marketing. Routledge, USA
Pappu, R., Quester, P. G., & Cooksey, R. W. (2006). Consumer-based brand equity and country-of-origin relationships: some empirical evidence. European Journal of Marketing, 40(5/6), 696-717. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610657903
Rodrigo, P., Khan, H., & Ekinci, Y. (2019). The determinants of foreign product preference amongst elite consumers in an emerging market. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 46, 139-148. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.04.012
Rojas-Méndez, J. I., & Chapa, S. (2019). X-Scale: a new scale to measure consumer xenocentrism. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, (Forthcoming, ahead-of-print), Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-01-2019-0062
Roth, M. S., & Romeo, J. B. (1992). Matching product category and country image perceptions: A framework for managing country-of-origin effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(3), 477-497. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490276
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority, Resource Allocation. Pittsburgh, USA: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-i
Tang, F., Tian, V. I., & Zaichkowsky, J. (2014). Understanding counterfeit consumption. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(1), 4-20. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-11-2012-0121
Tasci, A. D., & Gartner, W. C. (2007). Destination image and its functional relationships. Journal of Travel Research, 45(4), 413-425. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287507299569
Thakor, M. V., & Lavack, A. M. (2003). Effect of perceived brand origin associations on consumer perceptions of quality. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 12(6), 394-407. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420310498821
Triandis, H. C., Chan, D. K. S., Bhawuk, D. P., Iwao, S., & Sinha, J. B. (1995). Multimethod probes of allocentrism and idiocentrism. International Journal of Psychology, 30(4), 461-480. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599508246580
Upadhyay, Y. and Singh, S. K. (2006). Preference for domestic goods: A study of consumer ethnocentrism. Vision, 10(3), 59-68. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/097226290601000306
Wang, Y. C., Chen, T., & Yeh, Y. L. (2019). Advanced 3D printing technologies for the aircraft industry: a fuzzy systematic approach for assessing the critical factors. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 105(10), 4059-4069. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1927-8
Wang, Y. C., & Chen, T. C. T. (2019). A partial-consensus posterior-aggregation FAHP method—supplier selection problem as an example. Mathematics, 7(2), 179. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/math7020179
Wedley, W. C. (1993). Consistency prediction for incomplete AHP matrices. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 17(4-5), 151-161. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(93)90183-y
Wilcox D. (2015). Country-of-origin bias: A literature review and prescription for the global world. In: Spotts H. (Eds) Marketing, technology and customer commitment in the new economy. Developments in marketing science. Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11779-9_35
Winit, W., Gregory, G., Cleveland, M., and Verlegh, P. (2014). Global vs local brands: how home country bias and price differences impact brand evaluations. International Marketing Review, 31(2), 102-128.
Wu, F., Sun, Q., Grewal, R., & Li, S. (2019). Brand name types and consumer demand: Evidence from China’s automobile market. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(1), 158-175. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243718820571
Yadav, V., & Sharma, M. K. (2016). Multi-criteria supplier selection model using the analytic hierarchy process approach. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(1), 326-354. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-06-2014-0052
Yasin, N. M., Nasser Noor, M., & Mohamad, O. (2007). Does image of country-of-origin matter to brand equity? Journal of Product and Brand management, 16(1), 38-48. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420710731142
Zhou, L., & Hui, M. K. (2003). Symbolic value of foreign products in the People's Republic of China. Journal of International Marketing, 11(2), 36-58.
Zhou, L., Yang, Z., & Hui, M. K. (2010). Non-local or local brands? A multi-level investigation into confidence in brand origin identification and its strategic implications. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 202-218. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0153-1
?
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.