THE LEGACY OF THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY/NETWORK PROCESS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 26, 2017
Luis G Vargas

Abstract

There is no doubt that the Analytic Hierarchy Process is in itself a remarkable contribution to the field of decision making.  In this paper, I have tried to point out what I consider to be Tom Saaty’s three most important contributions within his Analytic Hierarchy Process: group decision making, conflict resolution and the fundamental equation of pairwise comparisons.  The third contribution occupied him most of his life in an attempt to connect pairwise comparisons with brain activity related to cognitive processes.  

https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v9i3.541

How to Cite

Vargas, L. G. (2017). THE LEGACY OF THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY/NETWORK PROCESS. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v9i3.541

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 928 | PDF Downloads 303

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

AHP, ANP, ranking, transitivity, decision-making

References
Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90400-9_6

Baez, J.C. (2001). The octonions, Bulletin of The American Mathematical Society, 39(2) 145-205. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-01-00934-X

Fisher, R. & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to YES: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Books.

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47(2), 263-291. Doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1914185

Saaty, T.L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15, 234–281. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5

Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill.

Saaty, T.L. (1986). Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 32(7), 841–855. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841

Saaty, T.L. (2015). The neural network process (NNP): Generalization of the AHP and ANP to the continuous case of neural firing. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.

Saaty, T.L. (2017a). Neurons the decision makers, Part I: The firing function of a single neuron, Neural Networks, 86, 102-114. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2016.04.003

Saaty, T.L. (2017b). Neurons the decision makers, Part II: The firings of many neurons and their density; the neural network its connections and field of firings, Neural Networks 86, 115-122. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2016.04.004

Saaty, T.L. and L.G. Vargas (2012). The possibility of group choice: Pairwise comparisons and merging functions, Social Choice and Welfare, 38(3), 481-496. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0541-6

Saaty, T.L. & Vargas, L.G. (2017). Origin of neural firing and synthesis in making comparisons, European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 10(4), 602-613.

Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G. & Zoffer, H.J. (2017). A structured scientific solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: the Analytic Hierarch Process approach, Decision Analytics 2(7), 2-53. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40165-015-0017-3

Thaler, R. H. (2017). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. W.W. Norton – via Google Books. Doi: 10.1111/risa.12871

Tversky, A. &Thaler, R.H. (1990). Anomalies: Preference reversals, The Journal of Economic Perspectives , 4(2), 201-211. Doi: 10.1257/jep.4.2.201
Section
Articles