This paper addresses the problem of sustainability assessment of territorial transformation through the use of the ANP. The case of a new transport infrastructure in a city located in Italy is considered in the study. The project discussed involves further development of the existing ring road in the city which will lead to a radically new multifunctional design of the urban area. In the case study, four alternatives have been identified and compared in order to select the most sustainable option. The model takes into consideration in more detail the different aspects of the decision-making process economic, environmental, social, transport and urban planning aspects) that have been organized according to the Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks (BOCR) categories. In the present study a focus group was organized with actors from Public Authorities in order to discuss the general aspects of the problem. Also, several experts were questioned in order to elicit the priorities of the aspects under consideration. The application of the ANP technique, which was performed using the Super Decisions software, allowed the most relevant aspects of the decision-making process to be highlighted.
Analytic Network Process, decision-making, territorial transformation, sustainability assessment, transport infrastructures
(2010). An Analytic Network Process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in
the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain). Journal of Environmental Management, 91,
Basbas, S., & Papanikolaou, A. (2009). Evaluation of a sustainable urban transport
system through the use of the transecon methodology. International Journal of
Sustainable Development and Planning 4(1), 18-34.
Bojkovi?, N., Macura, D., Pej?i?-Tarle, & S., Bojovi?, N. (2011). A comparative
assessment of transport-sustainability in central and Eastern European countries with a
brief reference to the republic of Serbia. International Journal of Sustainable
Transportation, 5(6), 319-344.
Bottero, M., & Ferretti, V. (2010). Integrating the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and
the Driving orce-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) model for the sustainability
assessment of territorial transformations. Management of Environmental Quality, 21(5),
Bottero, M., & Ferretti, V. (2011). An Analytic Network Process-based approach for
location problems: the case of a waste incinerator plant in the Province of Torino (Italy).
Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 17, 63–84.
Bottero, M., & Lami, I.M., (2010). Analytic Network Process and sustainable mobility:
an application for the assessment of different scenarios. Journal of Urbanism 3(3), 275-
Bottero, M., Lami, I.M., & Lombardi, P. (2008). Analytic Network Process. La
valutazione di scenari di trasformazione urbana e territoriale. Firenze: Alinea.
Bottero, M., & Mondini, G. (2008). An Appraisal of Analytic Network Process and its
role in sustainability assessment in Northern Italy. International Journal of Management
of Environmental Quality, 19(6), 642- 660.
Figueira. J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (Eds.). (2005). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis.
State of the Art Survey. New York: Springer.
Horsch K., Anderson C. (1997), Interview with Robert Yin. The Evaluation Exchange,
Khan, S., & Faisal, M.N. (2008). An analytic network process model for
municipal solid waste disposal options. Waste Management, 28(9), 1500-1508.
Liang, C., & Li, Q. (2008). Enterprise information system project selection with regard to
BOCR. International Journal of Project Management, 26(8), 810-820.
Liu, K.F.R., & Lai, J.H. (2009). Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: a
hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process. Expert Systems
with Applications, 36(3), 5119-5136.
Lombardi, P. (2009). Evaluation of sustainable urban redevelopment scenarios.
Proceeding of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning, 162(4),
Neaupane, K.M., & Piantanakulchai, M. (2006). Analytic network process model for
landslide hazard zonation. Engineering Geology, 85, 281-294.
Niemura, M.P., Saaty, T.L. (2004). An Analytic Network Process Model for financialcrisis
forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 20(4), 573-587.
Pèti, M. (2012). A territorial understanding of sustainability in public development.
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32(1), 61-73.
Piantanakulchai, M. (2005). Analytic Network Process model for highway corridor
planning. Proceedings of ISAHP 2005. Honolulu, Hawaii.
Saaty, RW. (2003). Decision-making in Complex Environments: The Analytic Hierarchy
Process (AHP) for Decision-making and the Analytic Network Process (ANP) for
Decision-making With Dependence and Feedback. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Saaty, RW. (2010). Routing BOCR against strategic criteria. (working paper).
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill.
Saaty, T.L. (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision
Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS
Saaty, TL. (2006). Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic
hierarchy/network processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 168, 557–570.
Saaty, TL, Ozdemir, MS. (2008). The Encyclicon. A Dictionary of Complex Decisions
Using the Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T.L., & Vargas, L.G. (2006). Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process.
New York: Springer.
Saaty, T., Vargas, L., Whitaker, R. (2009). Addressing with brevity criticisms of the
Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process,
Tsamboulas, D., Mikroudis, G. (2000). EFET-evaluation framework of
environmental impacts and costs of transport initiatives. Transportation Research, 5,
Tversky, A., Slovic P., Kahneman, D. (1990). The causes of preference reversal. The
American Economic Review, 80(1), 204-215.
Tuzkaya, G., & Onut, S. (2008). A fuzzy Analytic Network Process based approach to
transportation-mode selection between Turkey and Germany: a case study. Information
Sciences, 178(15), 3133-3146.
Tuzkaya, G., Onut, S., Tuzkaya, U.R., Gulsun, B. (2007). An Analytic Network Process
approach for locating undesirable facilities: an example from Istanbul, Turkey. Journal of
Environmental Management, 88, 970–983.
Ulutas, B.H. (2005). Determination of the appropriate energy policy for Turkey. Energy,
Yin, R. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods (1st ed.). Beverly Hills, CA:
Zoffer, J., Bahurmoz, A., Hamid, M.K., Minutolo M., & Saaty T. (2008). Synthesis of
complex criteria decision making: a case towards a consensus agreement for a Middle
East conflict resolution. Group Decision Negotiation, 17, 363-385.
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.