DECISION MAKING IN DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS AN APPLICATION OF MACHINE LEARNING TO THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published May 19, 2021
Rahim Jassemi-Zargani Caelum Kamps

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to propose a method of algorithmic decision making that builds on the Analytical Hierarchy Process by applying reinforcement learning. Decision making in dynamic environments requires adaptability as new information becomes available. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) provides a method for comparative decision making but is insufficient to handle information that becomes available over time. Using the opinions of one or many subject matter experts and the AHP, the relative importance of evidence can be quantified. However, the ability to explicitly measure the interdependencies is more challenging. The interdependency between the different evidence can be exploited to improve the model accuracy, particularly when information is missing or uncertain. To establish this ability within a decision-making tool, the AHP method can be optimized through a stochastic gradient descent algorithm. To illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, an experiment was conducted on air target threat classification in time series developing scenarios.

How to Cite

Jassemi-Zargani, R., & Kamps, C. (2021). DECISION MAKING IN DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS AN APPLICATION OF MACHINE LEARNING TO THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v13i1.766

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 1160 | PDF Downloads 588

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Threat assessments, AHP, Machine learning, Multi Criteria Decision Making

References
Johansson, F. & Falkman,G. (2008). A Bayesian network approach to threat evaluation with application to an air defense scenario. 11th International Conference on Information Fusion, 1-7. Cologne.

Liebhaber, M.J., Kobus, D.A., & Feher, B.A. (2002). Studies of U.S. navy cues, information order, and impact of conflicting data. Technical Report 1888. San Diego: SPAWAR Systems Center. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21236/ada406334

Menon, A., Mehrotra, K., Mohan, C.K., & Ranka, S. (1996). Characterization of a class of sigmoid functions with applications to neural networks. Neural Networks, 9(5), 819-835. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(95)00107-7

Mu, E. (2006). A unified framework for site selection and business forecasting using ANP. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 15(2), 178–188. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-5006-6

Ruder, S. (2017). An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. Computer Research Repository (CoRR), 1609.04747.

Saaty, T.L. (1987). The Analytical Hierarchy Process – What it is and how it is used. Pittsburgh, PA: Pergamon Journals Ltd.




Section
Articles