Since the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002, many studies have examined the impact of material weaknesses in internal control systems (MWICS) on firm performance. Overall, these studies indicate that a negative association exists between poor internal control and firm performance. Prior research suggests that the above noted association between internal control and firm performance should be affected by both the actual number and the different types of MWICS. However, this stream of research has focused on using a binary measure for internal control and has not considered the combined impact that the different types of MWICS may have on firm performance. In this study, we create and introduce a new internal control index, derived from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). We then show that more information regarding the impact of MWICS can be obtained through our AHP index measure as opposed to the binary measure that is commonly used. These findings have important implications for a firm’s stakeholders (e.g., managers, stockholders, creditors, financial analysts, employees, and auditors).
Analytic Hierarchy Process, internal control, performance measurement, material weakness, internal control measures
Asare, S. K. & Wright A. (2013). The effect of type of internal control report on users’ confidence in the accompanying financial statement report. Contemporary Accounting Review, 29(1), 152–175. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01080.x
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D.W. & Kinney, W.R. (2007). The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1-2), 166–192. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.10.001
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D.W., Kinney, W.R. & LaFond, R. (2008). The effect of SOX 404 internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 217–250. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.217
Balsam, S., Jiang, W. & Lu, B. (2014). Equity incentives and internal control weaknesses. Contemporary Accounting Review, 31(1), 178–201. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12018
Bedard, J.C. & Graham L. (2011). Detection and severity classifications of Sarbanes-Oxley section 404 internal control deficiencies. The Accounting Review, 86(3), 825–855. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000036
Bedard, J.C., Hoitash, R., Hoitash, U. & Westermann, K. (2012). Material weakness remediation and earnings quality: a detailed examination by type of control deficiency. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(1), 57–78. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10190
Beneish, M.D., Billings, M. & Hodder, L. (2008). Internal control weaknesses and information uncertainty. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 665–703. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.665
Carhart, M.M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82.
Chen, J., Chan, K.C., Dong, W. & Zhang, F. (2017). Internal control and stock price crash risk: evidence from China. European Accounting Review, 26(1), 125–152. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2015.1117008
Cheng, M., Dhaliwal, D. & Zhang, Y. (2013). Does investment efficiency improve after the disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(1), 1–18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.03.001
Cheng, Q., Goh, B.W., & Kim, J.B. (2018). Internal control and operational efficiency. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(2), 1102–1139. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12409
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2013). Internal Control – Integrated Framework. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Darrough, M., Huang, R. & Zur, E. (2018). Acquirer internal control weaknesses in the market for corporate control. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 211–244. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12366
D’Mello, R., Gao, X. & Jia, Y. (2017). Internal control and internal capital allocation: evidence from internal capital markets of multi-segment firms. Review of Accounting Studies, 22(1), 251–287. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-016-9377-8
Daniel, K. & Titman S. (1997). Evidence on the characteristics of cross sectional variation in stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 1–33. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3386/w5604
Dechow, P.M. & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 35–59. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35
Doyle, J. T., Ge, W., & McVay S. E. (2007a). Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1-2), 193–223. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.10.003
Doyle, J.T., Ge, W. & McVay S. (2007b). Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 82(5), 1141–1170. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1141
Fama, E.F. & French K.R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x
Fama, E.F. & French K.R. (2008). Average return, b/m, and share issues. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2971–2995. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01418.x
Fama, E.F. & MacBeth J.D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: empirical tests. The Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607–636. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/260061
Feng, M., Li, C., McVay, S.E. & Skaife, H. (2015). Does ineffective internal control over financial reporting affect a firm’s operations? Evidence form Firms’ Inventory Management. The Accounting Review, 90(2), 529–557. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50909
Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. & Schipper, K. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 295–327. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.06.003
Gao, X. & Jia, Y. (2016). Internal control over financial reporting and safeguarding of corporate resources: Evidence from the value of cash holdings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 783–814. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12164
Ge, W. & McVay, S. (2005). The disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control after the Sarbanes-Oxley act. Accounting Horizons, 19(3), 137–158. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2005.19.3.137
Ge, W., Koester, A. & McVay, S. (2017). Benefits and costs of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404(b) exemption: Evidence from small firms’ internal control disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(2), 358–384. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.01.001
Gordon, L.A. & Wilford, A. (2012). An analysis of multiple consecutive years of material weaknesses in internal control. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 2027–2060. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50211
Hammersley, J.S., Myers, L.A. & Shakespeare, C. (2008). Market reactions to the disclosure of internal control weaknesses and to the characteristics of those weaknesses under section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Review of Accounting Studies, 13(1), 141–165. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-007-9046-z
Keane, M.J., Elder, R.J. & Albring, S.M. (2012). The effect of the type and number of internal control weaknesses and their remediation on audit fees. Review of Accounting and Finance, 11(4), 377–399. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14757701211279178
Koester, A., Lim, S.C. & Vigeland, R.L. (2015). The effect of tax-related material weakness in internal controls on the market valuation of unrecognized tax benefits. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 37(1), 129–155. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-50952
Li, C., Peters, G., Richardson, V.J. & Watson, M.W. (2012). The consequences of information technology control weaknesses on management information system: The case of Sarbanes-Oxley Internal Control Reports. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 179–204. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/41410413
Loughran, T. & Wellman, J.W. (2011). New evidence on the relation between the enterprise multiple and average stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6), 1629–1650. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109011000445
Mao, J. & Ettredge, M. (2016). Internal control deficiency disclosures among Chinese reverse merger firms. Abacus, 52(3), 441–472. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12087
McNichols, M.F. (2002). Discussion of the quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 61–69. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.61
Ogneva, M., Subramanyam, K.R. & Raghunandan, K. (2007). Internal control weakness and cost of equity: Evidence form SOX section 404 disclosures. The Accounting Review, 82(5), 1255–1297. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1255
Ossadnik, W., Schinke, S. & Kaspar, R.H. (2016). Group aggregation techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A comparative analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(2), 421-457. Doi:
Rezee, Z., Espahbodi, R., Espahbodi, P. & Espahbodi, H. (2012). Firm characteristics and stock price reaction to SOX 404 Compliance. Abacus, 48(4), 473–501. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2012.00377.x
Rice, S.C. & Weber, D.P. (2012). How effective is internal control reporting under SOX 404? Determinants of the (non-) disclosure of existing material weaknesses. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 811–843. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2011.00434.x
Rice, S.C., Weber, D.P. & Wu, B. (2015). Does SOX 404 have teeth? Consequences of the failure to report existing internal control weaknesses. The Accounting Review, 90(3), 1169–1200. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50974
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (2003). Final rule: Management's report on internal control over financial reporting and certification of disclosure in exchange act periodic reports, 33-8238. Washington, D.C. http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8238.htm
Weiss, D. (2014). Internal controls in family-owned firms. European Accounting Review, 23(3), 463–482. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2013.821814
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.