COMPARISON BETWEEN AHP AND ANP: CASE STUDY OF STRATEGIC PLANNING OF E-LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 18, 2009
Nina Begicevic Blazenka Divjak Tihomir Hunjak

Abstract

The specific objectives of the paper are: validation of the theoretical model for strategic planning of e-learning implementation by means of factor analysis, presentation of the structure of AHP and ANP models for decision making about e-learning implementation, comparison between developed AHP and ANP models, analysis of the results of group decision making supported by sw TeamEC2000 based on AHP model and the results of decision making supported by sw Super Decisions 1.6.0. based on ANP model.

The models can be applied at the course level, for the group of courses (department level) or at the study program (faculty level). At the same time the proposed models are useful for structuring discussion on strategic decisions on e-learning implementation at the university level. Our aim is to analyze and identify advantages and disadvantages of using different models and tools in the process of decision making about e-learning at different organizational levels.

http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v1i1.5

How to Cite

Begicevic, N., Divjak, B., & Hunjak, T. (2009). COMPARISON BETWEEN AHP AND ANP: CASE STUDY OF STRATEGIC PLANNING OF E-LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v1i1.5

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 2725 | PDF Downloads 270

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

e-learning, AHP, ANP, factor analysis

References
Bates, T. (2005). Strategy and Visions of e-learning in Higher Education. Zagreb,
Croatia, URL: http://eqibelt.srce.hr/lectures/bates.html, 10(3).2006.
Begicevic, N., Divjak, B. (2006). Validation of theoretical model for decision making
about e-learning implementation. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences,
Faculty of Organization and Informatics. University of Zagreb, 30 (2), 171-185.
Begicevic, N., Divjak, B., Hunjak, T. (2006). Development of AHP based model for
decision making on e-learning implementation. 17th International Conference on
Information and Intelligent Systems IIS 2006, Varaždin, Faculty of Organization and
Informatics, University of Zagreb, 375-383.
Brace, N., Kemp, R., Snelgar, R. (2000). SPSS for Psychologists: A guide to data
analysis using SPSS for Windows. New York, N.Y: Palgrave.
Divjak, B., Begicevic, N. (2006). Imaginative acquisition of knowledge —strategic
planning of e-learning. ITI 2006. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on
Information Technology Interfaces. Cavtat, Croatia, 47-53.
EQIBELT, Education Quality Improvement by E-Learning Technology,. 16(01)2006,
URL:. http://eqibelt.srce.hr/
Rummel, R. J. (1967). Understanding factor analysis. The Journal of Conflict Resolution,
20(04)2006 URL: www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/UFA.HTM
Section
Articles