Open Journal Systems

AN AHP VARIATION MODELLING APPROACH FOR PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT OF SUPPLIERS OF INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS

Daniel K. Samoei, David Gichoya, Damaris Odero

Abstract


Selecting suitable suppliers of ICT products is always a challenging task for a procuring entity since it requires the consideration of multiple, competing, tangible and intangible criteria in determining optimal suppliers of a given product. This study investigated the evaluation criteria of suppliers of ICT products used by Moi University with a view to developing a multicriteria decision analysis model for evaluating the performance of suppliers of ICT products.  Hence, the study was guided by a variation of Saaty’s Analytical Hierarchy Process theory of measurement and targeted a population of 55 respondents comprised of 33 ICT staff and 22 procurement staff. Seventeen companies who bid to supply ICT products were targeted. Purposive sampling was used to select 7 companies who supply ICT products as per their prequalification status and there were 16 respondents; 11 from the Procurement unit and 5 from the ICT directorate respectively. Data was collected using questionnaires and documentary reviews. The study findings demonstrated that quality and transport and communication logistics were the most preferred evaluation criteria and sub criteria respectively, and the respondents had different preferential treatment on suppliers of ICT products as per the evaluation sub criterions. It is recommended that the model be adopted to assist the procurement unit in evaluating suppliers of ICT products and be customized for use in evaluating suppliers of other products at the University and other public institutions in Kenya.  

https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v9.i2.487


Keywords


AHP; ICT product; Multicriteria Decision Analysis; performance evaluation; Suppliers of ICT products

Full Text:

PDF

References


Belton V. (1990). Multi criteria decision analysis-practically the only way to choose. In Hendry, L.C. and Eglese, R.W. (Eds), Operational Research Tutorial Papers (53-101). Birmingham: OR Society.

G.O.K. (2015). Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act [online]

http://ppoa.go.ke/images/downloads/Public%20Procurement%20and%20Asset%20Disposal%20Act%202015.pdf.

G.O.K.(2009).Public Procurement Manual for ICT [online]

www.ppoa.go.ke/images/downloads/manuals/ict_manual.pdf

Dickson, G.W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 5-17.

Drucker ,P. F. (2002). The effective executive: The definitive guide to getting the right things done. United Kingdom: HarperCollins Publishers Ltd.

Mwikali R. and Kavale S. (2012). Factors affecting the selection of optimal suppliers in procurement management. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 12(14), 189-193.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. Doi: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Shalle, N.I & Guyo, W. & Amuhaya, I.M. (2014). Effects of buyer/supplier collaboration on e- procurement performance in state corporations in Kenya. European Journal of Management Sciences and Economics, 1(4), 170-185.

Samoei, D.K., Gichoya, D., & Odero, D. (2016). Management strategies for consumer supplier relationship in Kenya: A case of suppliers of information communication technology products in Moi University. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Research, 6(12).

Samoei, D.K. (2016). A modular neural network model for evaluation and selection of suppliers of information communications technology products at Moi University. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Moi University , Eldoret, Kenya.

Tahriri, F., Osman, M. R., Ali, A., & Yusuff, R. M. (2008). A review of supplier selection methods in manufacturing industries. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 15(3), 201-208.

Team, M. C., & Tummala, V. R. (2001). An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega, 29(2), 171-182. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00039-6




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v9i2.487