Open Journal Systems

Visual Management for Decision Analysis

Alessio Ishizaka

Abstract


Visual management has been recently recognized as an excellent way to convey decisions in a clear and convincing way. AHP already used visual techniques for evaluating the pairwise comparisons and performing a sensibility analysis. In this paper, we introduce a new descriptive tool GAIA that can be coupled with AHP in order to visualize the entire problem on a unique plane.

https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v9i1.475


Keywords


Visual management; GAIA; descriptive tool

Full Text:

PDF

References


Collins, A., A. Ishizaka, et al. (2017). Film production incentives, employment transformation and domestic expenditure in South Africa: visualizing subsidy effectiveness. International Journal of Cultural Policy advance online publications., 1-14. Doi: doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2016.1255206.

Dung, T., N. Luan, et al. (2016). The analytic approach in green supplier selection: a literature review. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(11), 6754-6762.

Forman, E. and S. Gass (2001). The Analytic Hierarchy Process – An exposition. Operations Research, 49(4), 469-486. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231

Golden, B., E. Wasil, et al. (1989). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and studies. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-50244-6_3

Ho, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 211-228. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004

Ishizaka, A. and A. Labib (2009). Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: benefits and limitations. OR Insight, 22(4), 201–220. Doi: 10.1057/ori.2009.10

Ishizaka, A., S. Siraj, et al. (2016). Which energy mix for the UK? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA-AHP visualisation tool. Energy 95, 602–611. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.009

Kumar, S. and O. Vaidya (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028

Liberatore, M. and R. Nydick (2008). The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 194-207. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001

Mareschal, B. and J.-P. Brans (1988). Geometrical representations for MCDA. European Journal of Operational Research, 34(1), 69-77. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90456-0

Nemery, P., A. Ishizaka, et al. (2012). Enriching descriptive information in ranking and sorting problems with visualizations techniques. Journal of Modelling in Management, 7(2), 130-147. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17465661211242778

Omkarprasad, V. and K. Sushil (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028

Saaty, T. and E. Forman (1992). The Hierarchon: A Dictionary of Hierarchies. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications. Doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-5443-0_11

Shim, J. (1989). Bibliography research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 23(3), 161-167. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(89)90013-X

Sipahi, S. and M. Timor (2010). The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5), 775-808. Doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741011043920

Siraj, S., L. Mikhailov, et al. (2013). PriEsT: an interactive decision support tool to estimate priorities from pairwise comparison judgments. International Transactions in Operational Research, 22(2), 217–235. Doi: 10.1111/itor.12054

Vargas, L. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 2-8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H

Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process: a survey of the method and its applications. Interface, 16(4), 96-108. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.16.4.96




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v9i1.475