To improve a firmâ€™s supply chain performance it is essential to have a vendor evaluation process to be able to showcase an organizationâ€™s success in the present aggressive market. Hence, the process of evaluating the vendor is a crucial task of the purchasing executives in supply chain management. The objective of this research is to propose a methodology to evaluate the vendors for a steel pipe manufacturing firm in Gujarat, India. For the purpose of the study, the Analytical Hierarchy Process was used to evaluate the best raw material vendor for this company. Multiple qualitative and quantitative criteria are involved in the vendor evaluation process.Â To solve the complex problem of vendor evaluation, a tradeoff between these multi-criteria is important. The outcomes indicated that the AHP technique makes it simpler to assign weights for the different criteria for evaluating the vendor. Research findings showed that quality is the most important criterion followed by delivery, cost and vendor relationship management.
cost, delivery, quality, vendor evaluation, vendor relationship management
Coulter, E., Coakley, J., & Sessions, J. (2006). The analytic hierarchy process: A tutorial for use in prioritizing forest road investments to minimize environmental effects. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 17(2), 51â€“70.
Dickson, G. W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 5â€“17.
Ghodsypour, S. H. & Oâ€™Brien, C. (1998). A decision support system for vendor selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programing. International Journal of Production Economics 56-57(1),199-212. Doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00009-1.x.
Giunipero, L. C. & Pearcy, D. H. (2000). World class purchasing skills: an empirical investigation. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36(3), 4â€“13. Doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2000.tb00081.x
Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16-24. Doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009. x.
Imeri, S. (2013). Key performance criteria for vendor evaluation - A literature review. Journal of Management Research and Practice, 5(2),63â€“75.
John, K., Baby, V. Y., & Mangalathu, G. S. (2003). Vendor evaluation and rating using analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology, 2(3), 447â€“455.
Kannan, V. & Tan, K. (2002). Supplier selection and assessment: Their impact on business performance. The Journal of Supply Chain Management: A Global Review of Purchasing and Supply, 38(4), 11â€“21. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.2002.tb00139.x.
Mowshowitz, A. (1997). Virtual organization. Communications of the ACM, 40(9), 30â€“37. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/260750.260759.
Saaty, T. L. & Tran, L. T. (2007). On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7-8), 962â€“975. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.022
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00137918308956077.
Saaty, T. L., & Hu, G. (1998). Ranking by eigenvector versus other methods in the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Mathematics Letters, 11(4), 121â€“125.
Sonawane, S., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2015). Evaluation of suppliersâ€™ performanceâ€“Quality aspect using AHP & system dynamics techniques. International Journal of Science and Research, 4(6), 2124â€“2128.
Tahriri, F., Osman, M., Ali, A., Yusuff, R., & Esfandiary, A. (2008). AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 1(2), 54â€“76. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.v1n2.
Tam, M. C. Y. & Tummala, V. M. R. (2001). An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega, 29(2), 171â€“182. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00039-6.
Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Benton, W. C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European journal of operational research, 50(1), 2â€“18. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-R.
Yahya, S., & Kingsman, B. (1999). Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development programme: A case study using the analytic hierarchy process method. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(9), 916-930. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3010189.
Yu, X., & Jing, S. (2004). A decision model for supplier selection considering trust. Chinese Business Review, 3(6), 15â€“20. ISSN1537-1506.
Yusuff, R. M., Yee, K. P., & Hashmi, M. S. J. (2001). A preliminary study in potential use of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to predict advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) implementation. Robotics and computer integrated manufacturing, 17(1),421â€“427. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5845(01)00016-3
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.