Supply chain management (SCM) is a critical factor in the current global scenario. This organizational capability has a recent knowledge base, which is being accumulated, validated, and certified by groups like the Association for Operations Management (APICS).Â Therefore, training in SCM has been growing as one of the most convenient ways of becoming â€œCertified in Production and Inventory Managementâ€ (CPIM) from APICS.Â Companies all over the world have invested in SCM training; however, some companies have conditioned the continuity of their training programs to the benefits assessment. This paper contributes by proposing an evaluation model for specific program training on SCM. This model was applied in a global chemical company, which allowed capturing its impact on organizational and individual competencies, as well as on the core competencies.Â The proposed model includes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and concepts in the SCM literature.Â The main result revealed by this research is that an SCM training based on APICS CPIM is really perceived as beneficial, in individual or organizational terms, for a real-world company. Therefore, this company should be confident that its SCM training program is improving and strengthening its core competencies.
Analytic Hierarchy Process, Supply Chain Management, Training
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99â€“120.
Barney, J. B., Wright, M., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625â€“641.
Blackstone, J. H. Jr. (Ed.) (2013). APICS Dictionary. 14th Edition. Chicago: APICS.
Bukowitz, W. R., Williams, R. L., & Mactas, E. S. (2004). Human capital
measurement. Research Technology Management, 47(3), 43â€“49.
Bulkeley, H. (2006). Urban sustainability: learning from best practice?. Environment and planning A. 38(6), 1029.
Chan, F. T. S., & Kumar, N. (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 35(4), 417â€“431.
Chan, F. T. S., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M. K., Lau, H. C. W., & Choy, K. L. (2008). Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of Production Research, 46(14), 3825â€“3857.
Cheung, M. S., Myers, M. B., & Mentzer, J. T. (2010). Does relationship learning lead to relationship value? A cross-national supply chain investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 28(6), 472â€“487.
Coriat, B., & Dosi, G. (2002). The nature and accumulation of organizational competences/capabilities. Revista Brasileira de InovaÃ§Ã£o, 1(2), 275â€“326.
Draganidis, F., & Mentzas, G. (2006). Competency based management: a review of systems and approaches. Information Management & Computer Security, 14(1), 51â€“64.
Drake, P. R., & Lee, D. M. (2008). Component prioritisation for strategic purchasing and the case study of a South Korean elevator manufacturer. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 43(9-10), 883â€“895.
Ertay, T., Kahveci, a., & TabanlÄ±, R. M. (2011). An integrated multi-criteria group decision-making approach to efficient supplier selection and clustering using fuzzy preference relations. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24(12), 1152â€“1167.
Ha, S., & Krishnan, R. (2008). A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(2), 1303â€“1311.
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resourceâ€based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic management journal, 24(10), 997â€“1010.
Ho, W., & Emrouznejad, A. (2009). Multi-criteria logistics distribution network design using SAS/OR. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 7288â€“7298.
Hult, G.T.M., Ketchen, D.J.K. , & Arrelti, M. (2007). Strategic supply chain management: Improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development. Strategic. Management. Journal, 28, 1035-1052.
Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?. Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017â€“1027.
Figueiredo,P. N. (2005). Technological accumulation and industrial innovation. Concepts, measurement and evidence in Brazil. SÃ£o Paulo em Perspectiva, 19(1), 54â€“69. (In Portuguese)
Fleury, M.T.L., & Fleury, A. (2001). Building the concept of competence. Revista AdministraÃ§Ã£o ContemporÃ¢nea, 5, 183â€“196. (In Portuguese)
Fleury, M.T.L., & Fleury, A. (2004). Aligning strategy and skills. Revista de AdministraÃ§Ã£o de Empresas, 44(1), 44â€“57. (In Portuguese)
Gammelgaard, B. & Larson, P. D. (2001). Logistics skills and competencies for supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 27â€“50.
Gilbert, L. (2014). Social justice and the" Green" city urbe. Revista Brasileira de GestÃ£o Urbana, 6(2), 158â€“169.
Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis: methods and software. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (2003). Managing human resources through strategic partnerships. (8th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Pub.
Khadivar, A., Zadeh, A. R., Khani, M., & Jalali, S. M. J. (2007, December). A conceptual model for knowledge flow in supply chain. In Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2007 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 352-356). IEEE.
LeBoterf, G. (1998). Evaluer les compeÂ´tences, quels jugements? Quels crite`res? Quelles instances? La CompeÂ´tence au Travail, 135(2), 143â€“51.
Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Rao, S. S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107â€“124.
Lu, L. Y. Y., Wu, C. H., & Kuo, T.-C. (2007). Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4317â€“4331.
Lummus, R.R. (2007). The role of APICS in professionalizing operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 336â€“345.
Manyathi, S., & Niyimbanira, F. (2014). A theoretical evaluation of the role of training for supply chain management employees of the Department of Provincial Treasury: Case of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(7), 231.
Naesens, K., Gelders, L., & Pintelon, L. (2009). A swift response framework for measuring the strategic fit for a horizontal collaborative initiative. International Journal of Production Economics, 121(2), 550â€“561.
Oxford Dictionaries (2015). Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com (accessed May 27, 2015)
Palma-Mendoza, J. a. (2014). Analytical Hierarchy Process and SCOR model to support supply chain re-design. International Journal of Information Management, 34(5), 634â€“638.
Prahalad, C., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79â€“91.
Rabelo, L., Eskandari, H., Shaalan, T., & Helal, M. (2007). Value chain analysis using hybrid simulation and AHP. International Journal of Production Economics, 105(2), 536â€“547.
Saaty, T.L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234â€“281.
Saaty, T.L., & Ozdemir, M. (2003). Negative priorities in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 37, 1063â€“1075.
Saaty, T.L. (2006). Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 168, 557â€“570.
Saaty, T.L. (2010a). Principia Mathematica Decernendi: Mathematical principles of decision-making. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T.L. (2010b). Who won the winter 2010 Olympics? A quest into priorities. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 17 (1â€“2), 25â€“36.
Saen, R. F. (2007). A new mathematical approach for suppliers selection: Accounting for non-homogeneity is important. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 185(1), 84â€“95.
Satiman, L. H., Abu Mansor, N. N., & Zulkifli, N. (2015). Return on Investment (ROI) training evaluation in Malaysian SMEs: factors influencing the adoption process. Development and Learning in Organizations, 29(2), 18â€“21.
Sevkli, M., Lenny Koh, S. C., Zaim, S., Demirbag, M., & Tatoglu, E. (2007). An application of data envelopment Analytic Hierarchy Process for supplier selection: a case study of BEKO in Turkey. International Journal of Production Research, 45(9), 1973â€“2003.
Sharma, M. J., Moon, I., & Bae, H. (2008). Analytic Hierarchy Process to assess and optimize distribution network. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 202(1), 256â€“265.
Schoenherr, T., Griffith, D. A., & Chandra, A. (2014). Knowledge management in supply chains: The role of explicit and tacit knowledge. Journal of Business Logistics, 35(2), 121â€“135.
Tan, K. C. (2001). A framework of supply chain management literature. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(1), 39â€“48.
Tracey, M., & Smith-Doerflein, K.A. (2001). Supply chain management: what training professionals need to know. Industrial and Commercial Training, 33(3), 99â€“104.
Treem, J. W. (2013).Technology use as a status cue: The influences of mundane and novel technologies on knowledge assessments in organizations. Journal of Communication, 63, 1032â€“1053
Van Zyl, C. (2003). Supply chain knowledge management adoption increases overall efficiency and competitiveness. South Africa Journal of Information Management, 5(4).
Wang, X., Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W. Y., & Diaz-Rainey, I. (2012). A two-stage fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 595â€“606.
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265â€“289.
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.