Long term sustainability of renewable energy projects in Nepal has been challenging issue because the projects are built in with a certain amount of investment subsidy from government. After installation of the energy system, it is the responsibility of the participating community or the users to operate, maintain and manage the system. The sustainability of renewable energy projects considered largely depends on how much revenue it can generate from its users for operation, maintenance and management. Revenue from usersâ€™ depends upon multiple factors categorized as technical, financial / economic, social, institutional and environmental. As such, sustainability of the projects needs to be evaluated based on the multiple criteria in a holistic manner. The paper is built on identifying the all possible factors relating to sustainability of rural and renewable energy projects in Nepal from the perspective of all concerned people i.e. project implementers to end users, in addition to the all the stakeholders, in the changed context of climate change and green economy. The paper reviews briefly the literature on utility of multi criteria methods for sustainability assessment of renewable energy projects. Assessment of relative standing of AHP is further conducted. An appropriate AHP based framework for sustainability assessment of the projects is recommended with due consideration to identified factors of sustainability concern from peoplesâ€™ perspective with the wider representation.
sustainability, renewable energy, multiple criteria analysis, AHP.
CBS (2010-2011). Nepal Living Standards Survey. Central Bureau of Statistics, Volume
I, 2010-2011, Government of Nepal.
Drexhage, J., & Murphy, D. (2010). Sustainable development: From Brundtland to Rio
2012. United Nations Headquarters, New York.
Carrera, D.G., & Mack, A. (2009). Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via
social indicators: Results of a survey among European energy experts. Energy Policy, 38
Afgan, N. H. et al. (2008). Sustainability assessment of a hybrid energy system. Energy
Policy, 36(8), 2903– 2910.
Hak, T. et al. (2012). A method to assess the relevance of sustainability indicators:
Application to the indicator set of the Czech Republic’s Sustainable Development
Strategy. Elsevier Ecological Indicators, 17, 46–57.
Oikonomou, V. (2011).Linking least-cost energy system costs models with MCA: An
assessment of the EU renewable energy targets and supporting policies. Elsevier Energy
Policy, 39, 2786–2799.
Bhattarai,S. (1997). Appropriate scale of hydropower development for Nepal: A multicriteria
decision making approach. Masters of Engineering Thesis, School of Civil
Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology.
Bhattarai, S., & Adhikari, B.K. (2011). Analytic Hierarchy Process for rural micro
project sustainability monitoring in Nepal. Proceeding of International Symposium on
Analytic Hierarchy Process 2011 – ISAHP 2011, Pittsburgh, Creative Decision
Panthi, K. & Bhattarai, S. (2008). A framework to assess sustainability of communitybased
water projects using multi-criteria analysis. First International Conference on
Construction In Developing Countries (ICCIDC-I), Karachi, Pakistan.
Martchamadol, J. & Kumar, S. (2013). An aggregated energy security performance
indicator. Elsevier Applied Energy, 103, 653–670.
Vaidya, O.S. & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of
applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.
Amigum, B. et al. (2011). Multi criteria analysis for sustainability assessments of
electricity generation systems in a rural community in South Africa. Micro
Perspectives for Decentralized Energy Supply (MPDES), Proceedings of the
International Conference, Technische Universität Berlin.
Wang, J.J et al. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable
energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9), 2263–2278.
Singh, R.K. et al. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies.
Elsevier Ecological Indicators, 15(1), 281–299.
Nieves, L.J & Rio, P. del. (2010). Contribution of renewable energy sources to the
sustainable development of islands: An overview of the literature and a research agenda.
Open Access, Sustainiability, 2, 783-811.
Ilskog, E. and Kjellstrom, B.(2008). And then they lived sustainably ever after?
Assessment of rural electrification cases by means of indicators. Elsevier Energy Policy
Sovacool, B. K. (2013). A qualitative factor analysis of renewable energy and Sustainable
Energy for All (SE4ALL) in the Asia-Pacific. Elsevier Energy Policy, 59, 393–403.
Kahraman, C., & Kaya, I. (2010). A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among
energy alternatives. Expert Systems with Applications, In Press, Corrected Proof, DOI:
Ishizaka A., & Labib, A.(2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic
hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336-14345.
Amer,M., & Daim, T.U.(2011). Selection of renewable energy technologies for a
developing county: A case of Pakistan. Elsevier Energy for Sustainable Development, 15,
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.