##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 1, 2014
Ram Prasad Dhital Parakram Pyakurel Tri Ratna Bajracharya Rajendra Shrestha

Abstract

Long term sustainability of renewable energy projects in Nepal has been challenging issue because the projects are built in with a certain amount of investment subsidy from government. After installation of the energy system, it is the responsibility of the participating community or the users to operate, maintain and manage the system. The sustainability of renewable energy projects considered largely depends on how much revenue it can generate from its users for operation, maintenance and management. Revenue from users’ depends upon multiple factors categorized as technical, financial / economic, social, institutional and environmental. As such, sustainability of the projects needs to be evaluated based on the multiple criteria in a holistic manner. The paper is built on identifying the all possible factors relating to sustainability of rural and renewable energy projects in Nepal from the perspective of all concerned people i.e. project implementers to end users, in addition to the all the stakeholders, in the changed context of climate change and green economy. The paper reviews briefly the literature on utility of multi criteria methods for sustainability assessment of renewable energy projects. Assessment of relative standing of AHP is further conducted. An appropriate AHP based framework for sustainability assessment of the projects is recommended with due consideration to identified factors of sustainability concern from peoples’ perspective with the wider representation.


http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v6i1.250


 


 


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

sustainability, renewable energy, multiple criteria analysis, AHP.

References
AEPC (2011). Annual Report for 2010. Alternative Energy Promotion Centre (AEPC).
CBS (2010-2011). Nepal Living Standards Survey. Central Bureau of Statistics, Volume
I, 2010-2011, Government of Nepal.
Drexhage, J., & Murphy, D. (2010). Sustainable development: From Brundtland to Rio
2012. United Nations Headquarters, New York.
Carrera, D.G., & Mack, A. (2009). Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via
social indicators: Results of a survey among European energy experts. Energy Policy, 38
(2) 1030–1039.
Afgan, N. H. et al. (2008). Sustainability assessment of a hybrid energy system. Energy
Policy, 36(8), 2903– 2910.
Hak, T. et al. (2012). A method to assess the relevance of sustainability indicators:
Application to the indicator set of the Czech Republic’s Sustainable Development
Strategy. Elsevier Ecological Indicators, 17, 46–57.
Oikonomou, V. (2011).Linking least-cost energy system costs models with MCA: An
assessment of the EU renewable energy targets and supporting policies. Elsevier Energy
Policy, 39, 2786–2799.
Bhattarai,S. (1997). Appropriate scale of hydropower development for Nepal: A multicriteria
decision making approach. Masters of Engineering Thesis, School of Civil
Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology.
Bhattarai, S., & Adhikari, B.K. (2011). Analytic Hierarchy Process for rural micro
project sustainability monitoring in Nepal. Proceeding of International Symposium on
Analytic Hierarchy Process 2011 – ISAHP 2011, Pittsburgh, Creative Decision
Foundation.
Panthi, K. & Bhattarai, S. (2008). A framework to assess sustainability of communitybased
water projects using multi-criteria analysis. First International Conference on
Construction In Developing Countries (ICCIDC-I), Karachi, Pakistan.
Martchamadol, J. & Kumar, S. (2013). An aggregated energy security performance
indicator. Elsevier Applied Energy, 103, 653–670.
Vaidya, O.S. & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of
applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.
Amigum, B. et al. (2011). Multi criteria analysis for sustainability assessments of
electricity generation systems in a rural community in South Africa. Micro
Perspectives for Decentralized Energy Supply (MPDES), Proceedings of the
International Conference, Technische Universität Berlin.
Wang, J.J et al. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable
energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9), 2263–2278.
Singh, R.K. et al. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies.
Elsevier Ecological Indicators, 15(1), 281–299.
Nieves, L.J & Rio, P. del. (2010). Contribution of renewable energy sources to the
sustainable development of islands: An overview of the literature and a research agenda.
Open Access, Sustainiability, 2, 783-811.
Ilskog, E. and Kjellstrom, B.(2008). And then they lived sustainably ever after?
Assessment of rural electrification cases by means of indicators. Elsevier Energy Policy
36(7), 2674-2684.
Sovacool, B. K. (2013). A qualitative factor analysis of renewable energy and Sustainable
Energy for All (SE4ALL) in the Asia-Pacific. Elsevier Energy Policy, 59, 393–403.
Kahraman, C., & Kaya, I. (2010). A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among
energy alternatives. Expert Systems with Applications, In Press, Corrected Proof, DOI:
10.1016/j.eswa.2010.1002.1095.
Ishizaka A., & Labib, A.(2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic
hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336-14345.
Amer,M., & Daim, T.U.(2011). Selection of renewable energy technologies for a
developing county: A case of Pakistan. Elsevier Energy for Sustainable Development, 15,
420–435.
Section
Articles