This paper proposes an evaluation framework of sustainable manufacturing (SM) initiatives using the hierarchical structure of sustainability indicators set adopted by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (US NIST) in the context of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Evaluating SM initiatives developed by manufacturing firms is crucial for resource allocation, and ensuring that investments enhance the sustainability performance of the firm. This evaluation is a challenge because of the multi-criteria nature of the problem and the presence of subjective criteria for which little or no information on their measurement systems is available. Thus, this study is appropriate due to the following reasons: (1) US NIST provides a comprehensive evaluation model of sustainability with its four-level hierarchy that provides evidence of depth and details of sustainability evaluation, and (2) AHP has the capability to handle multi-level decision-making structure with the use of expert judgments in a pairwise comparison process. A case study of a semiconductor manufacturing firm is presented to illustrate the proposed evaluation framework. Results show that firms must strengthen their financial base through programs that improve efficiency, quality and productivity before carrying out initiatives that address the environment and the immediate community. This work presents a framework that could guide decision-makers, in a way that is simple and comprehensive in their attempt to promote sustainability.
sustainable manufacturing, evaluation, analytic hierarchy process, multi-criteria decision-making
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.