ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS APPLIED TO INDUSTRIAL LOCATION: A BRAZILIAN PERSPECTIVE ON JEANS MANUFACTURING

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 20, 2016
Jose Fabiano Serra Costa Aline Ramos Borges Thaís dos Santos Machado

Abstract

The textile sector is one of the most important among all industrial branches. It is important in world commerce because it is a highlight both in the economy of developed countries and in emergent countries. The purpose of this study is to help a Brazilian textile company, which specializes in jeans production, to study the conditions for installing a plant in three possible regions where the most important textile companies of the country are located. In the study, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multicriteria methodology for decision support, is used and results show a slight tendency toward the Rio de Janeiro state when compared to the Santa Catarina state, with both presenting a significant advantage over the Rio Grande do Norte state.

How to Cite

Serra Costa, J. F., Borges, A. R., & Machado, T. dos S. (2016). ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS APPLIED TO INDUSTRIAL LOCATION: A BRAZILIAN PERSPECTIVE ON JEANS MANUFACTURING. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v8i1.210

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 2557 | PDF Downloads 475

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Textile industry, industrial location, multicriteria decision, AHP

References
ABIT - Associação Brasileira da Indústria Têxtil e de Confecção. Relatório de atividades 2013. Available at: < http://www.abit.org.br/Publicacao.aspx >. Accessed: March 2014.

Aubert, C., Goldminc, M. (2001). Vétement: la fibre écologique. [s.l.]: Terre Vivante.

Brunelli, M., Fedrizzi, M. (2011). Characterizing properties for inconsistency indices in the AHP, Proceedings of The International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Sorrento, Italy.

Cebeci, U. (2008). Fuzzy AHP-based decision support system for selecting ERP systems in textile industry by using balanced scorecard. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8900–8909. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.046

Cury, V.M. (1999). Algodão e proteção: Indústria textil no Brasil, 1890 – 1930. História Revista, 4 (1/2), 79-97.

Escobar, M.T., Aguarón, J., Moreno-Jiménez, J.M. (2004). A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean prioritization procedure. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 318 -322.doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00154-1

Escobar, M.T., Moreno-Jiménez, J.M. (2007). Aggregation of individual preference structures in AHP-group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 16(4), 287-301. doi: 10.1007/s10726-006-9050-x

ErtuÄŸrul,I. KarakaÅŸoÄŸlu, N. (2008). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(7-8), 783-795. doi:10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8

Forman, E., Peniwati, K. (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 108(1), 165-169. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00244-0

Freitas, A.L.P., Trevizano, W. A., Costa, H.G. (2008). Uma abordagem multicritério para problemas decisórios com múltiplos grupos de avaliadores. Investigação Operacional, 28, 133-149.

Garuti, C., Sandoval, M. (2006). The AHP: A multicriteria decision making methodology for shiftwork prioritizing. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 15(2), 189-200. doi:10.1007/s11518-006-5007-5

Gorini, A.P.F. (2000). Panorama do setor têxtil no Brasil e no mundo: reestruturação e perspectivas. BNDES Setorial, Rio de Janeiro, 12, 17-50.

Innes, J. (2008). Managing impact reduction in fisheries: A multi-criteria assessment of objective priorities. Proceeding of the 37th Australian Conference of Economist (ACE08), Queensland, Australia.

Kaya, E., Caliskan, F.D., Gozlu, S. (2007). Manufacturing performance criteria: An AHP application in a textile company. Management of Engineering and Technology, 1186 – 1194. doi: 10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349442

Kon, A., Coan, D.C. (2005). Transformações da indústria têxtil Brasileira: A transição para a modernização. Revista de Economia Mackenzie, São Paulo, 3( 3), 11-34.

Koprulu, A., Albayrakoglu, M.M. (2007). Supply chain management in the textile industry: a supplier selection model with the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Proceeding of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Viña Del Mar, Chile.

Leão, M. D. (1999). Desenvolvimento tecnológico para controle ambiental na indústria têxtil: Malhas no estado de minas gerais. Relatório final. Belo Horizonte, 255.

Majumdar, A., Sarkar, B., Majumdar, P. K. (2005). Determination of quality value of cotton fibre using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS method of multi-criteria decision-making. Journal of the Textile Institute, 96(5), 303-309. doi:10.1533/joti.2005.0013

Malhotra, V. A., Lee M. D., Khurana, (2007). A domain experts influence decision quality: Towards a robust method for their identification. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 57, 181-194. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2005.09.007

Melo, M.O.B.C., Cavalcanti, G.A., Gonçalves, H.S., Duarte, S.T.V.G. (2007). Inovações tecnológicas na cadeia produtiva têxtil: Análise e estudo de caso em indústria no Nordeste do Brasil. Revista Produção On Line, 7(2), 99-117. Available in: . Accessed: April 2014.

Nordås, H.K. (2004). The global textile and clothing industry post the agreement on textiles and clothing. World, 7, 1-000.

Oliveira, M.H. (1977). Principais matérias-primas utilizadas na indústria têxtil. BNDES Setorial, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

Panucci-Filho, L., Garcias, P.M. Visão Geral das Alianças no Crescimento das Organizações: Uma Análise sob a Ótica das Indústrias de Confecções de Jeans. (2010). Revista ADMpg Gestão Estratégica, PR, 3(1), Available at: . Accessed: March 2013.

Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw Hill.
doi: 10.1080/00137918308956077

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making, Why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors, the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process, RACSAM - Review of the Royal Spanish Academy of Sciences, Series A, Mathematics, 102 (2), 251-318. doi: 10.1007/BF03191825

Saaty, T. L., Peniwati, K. (2007). Group decision making: Drawing out and reconciling differences. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

Saboia, J.; Kubrusly, L. (2008). Diferenciais regionais e setoriais na indústria Brasileira. Revista de Economia Aplicada, 12(1), 125-149.
doi: 10.1590/S1413-80502008000100006

Serra Costa, J.F. (2011). A genetic algorithm to obtain consistency in Analytic Hierarchy Process. Brazilian Jounal of Operations & Production Management, 8(1), 55-64. doi: 10.4322/bjopm.2011.003

Shyjith, K., Ilangkumaran, M., Kumanan, S. (2008) Multicriteria decision making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 14 (4), 375 – 386.
doi: 10.1108/13552510810909975

Sousa, L. G. (2004). Memórias de economia: A realidade Brasileira. [s.l.]: Eumed.net. 226. Available at: . Access in: April 2011.

Stein, S. (1979). Origens e evolução da indústria textil no Brasil – 1850/1950. Editora Campus, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

Vaidya, O. S., Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic Hierarchy Process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169 (1), 1-29. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028

Vargas, L.G. (1982). Reciprocal matrices with random coefficients. Mathematical Modelling, 3, 69-81. doi:10.1016/0270-0255(82)90013-6

Yurdakul, M., Tansel Ic, Y. (2004). AHP approach in the credit evaluation of the manufacturing firms in Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 88(3), 269–289. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00189-0
Section
Articles