This paper provides a comprehensive review and critique of a firm's management consultancy selection, and presents a new analytical framework with sensitivity analysis to quantify the priority of criteria and sub-criteria in the management consultancy selection. The advantage of this analytical framework is that it adds the quantitative precision and sensitivity analysis to increase applicability and ease of use for decision making in the consultancy selection. Through literature reviews and in-depth interviews and case studies, this paper clarifies the importance of criteria in overcoming the difficulty of ex-ante evaluation due to information asymmetries when using the analytic hierarchy process. It also extends the alternatives of consultancy selection from a management consulting company to academic consultants, and explores the possibilities of a dynamic selection mechanism depending on the nature of the problem, and the circumstances. The results show that the most important criterion is the type of solution (43.51%), followed by interviews and case studies or reviews of case studies and consultantâ€™s ability (25.79%), then the type of problem (24.17%), and lastly the perceived benefits of the consulting project (6.53%). Also, the results suggest that a management consulting company is preferred to academic consultants. Further analysis of the Limit Matrix and sensitivity analysis shows that the type of solution, the consultantâ€™s ability and the perceived benefit of the consulting project have direct and dominant influence in the consultancy selection, and the type of problem has the opposite effect in the consultancy selection. This paper contributes to the theoretical research, and improves the practitionerâ€™s ability to achieve a proper selection in management consultancy.
Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Management Consultancy Selection, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Priority Analysis, Sensitivity Analysis
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.