Published Jul 30, 2013
Birhanu Beshah Daniel Kitaw


This paper deals with the application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to solve decision making problems in the Development Bank of Ethiopia project financing process. This paper presents an AHP model to select the most feasible project among alternatives. The model has seven criteria including: technical, market and demand, financial, socio-economic, institutional, discounting and non-discounting factors. For these main criteria there are twenty seven sub-criteria. The application of this method in a financial institution ensures reduction of the project evaluation time and increases reliability of the decision made. Furthermore, since the decision made can be traced back to the model at any time, the new method will reduce corruption and promote employees’ confidence.



Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 2298 | PDF Downloads 42



Decision making, AHP, project financing

Ababutain,Y. Abdulaziz. (2002). A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model For Selection
of BOT Toll Road Proposals Within The Public Sector. Thesis for doctor of philosophy,
University of Pittsburgh.
Arbel, A. and Orgler, YE. (1990). An application of the AHP to bank strategic planning:
the mergers and acquisitions process. European Journal of Operation Research, 48(1),
Beshah, B. and Kitaw, D. (2013). The evaporating cloud diagram: a tool to resolve
conflicts in the Ethiopian Banks. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(1),
Chandra, Praasanna. (2005). Projects Planning, Analysis, Financing, Implementation,
and Review, Fifth Ed. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Limited.
Commercial Bank of Ethiopia (CBE). (2005). Credit Policy.
Construction and Business Bank (CBB). (2006). Credit Policy.
Development Bank of Ethiopia (DBE). (2006). Credit Policy.
Huang, CC., Chu, PY., and Chiang, YH. (2008). A fuzzy AHP application in government
sponsored R&D project selection. Omega, 36(6), 1038-52.
Liang, Wen-Yau. (2003). The analytic hierarchy process in project evaluation: an R&D
case study in Taiwan. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10(5), 445 – 456.
Saaty, L.Thomas. (1990). Decision Making for Leaders Analytic Hierarchy Process
Approach. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Shin, C. et al. (2007). Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process to evaluation of the
national nuclear R&D projects: the case of Korea. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 49 (5),
Sipahi, S, Timor, M. (2010). The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network
Process: an overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5), 775 – 808.
Sun, Y. et al. (2008). A group decision support approach to evaluate experts for R&D
project selection. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1), 158-70.
Wang, K. et al. (2005). Analytic Hierarchy Process with fuzzy scoring in evaluating
multidisciplinary R&D projects in China. IEEE Transactions on Engineering
Management, 52(1), 119-29.