##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 11, 2012
Claudio Garuti Valerio A.P. Salomon

Abstract

In the Analytic Hierarchy Process priorities are derived from judgments. Different priority vectors, however, can be obtained in the solution of a problem. The main objective of this article is to present two different compatibility indices between priority vectors that have been suggested. A comparison between the indices is presented, following a mixed qualitative-quantitative research approach.


http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v4i2.130

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Compatibility Index, Garuti Compatibility Index, Saaty Compatibility Index, Priority Vector, Analytic Hierarchy Process, multi-criteria decision theory

References
Bryman, A.,& Bell, E. (2007).Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Emond, E. J.,& Mason, D. W. (2002) A new rank correlation coefficient with application
to the consensus ranking problem. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,11, 17–28.
Garuti A., C. (2007). Measuring compatibility (closeness) in weighted environments.
Proceedings of the International Symposium on the AHP, Vina del Mar, Chile, August 2–
6.
Saaty, T. L., (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of
Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281.
Saaty, T. L., (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision
Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS
Publications.
Saaty, T. L., (2011). Aligning the measurement of tangibles with intangibles and not the
converse. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 3(1), 79–87.
Saaty, T.L., & Peniwati, K. (2007).Group decision-making: Drawing out and reconciling
differences. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Whitaker, R. (2007). Validation examples of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic
Network Process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, 840–859.
Zanakis, S.H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N., & Dublish, S. (1998) Multi-Attribute Decision
Making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational
Research, 107(3), 507-529.
Section
Articles