In the Analytic Hierarchy Process priorities are derived from judgments. Different priority vectors, however, can be obtained in the solution of a problem. The main objective of this article is to present two different compatibility indices between priority vectors that have been suggested. A comparison between the indices is presented, following a mixed qualitative-quantitative research approach.
Compatibility Index, Garuti Compatibility Index, Saaty Compatibility Index, Priority Vector, Analytic Hierarchy Process, multi-criteria decision theory
Emond, E. J.,& Mason, D. W. (2002) A new rank correlation coefficient with application
to the consensus ranking problem. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,11, 17–28.
Garuti A., C. (2007). Measuring compatibility (closeness) in weighted environments.
Proceedings of the International Symposium on the AHP, Vina del Mar, Chile, August 2–
Saaty, T. L., (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of
Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281.
Saaty, T. L., (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision
Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS
Saaty, T. L., (2011). Aligning the measurement of tangibles with intangibles and not the
converse. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 3(1), 79–87.
Saaty, T.L., & Peniwati, K. (2007).Group decision-making: Drawing out and reconciling
differences. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Whitaker, R. (2007). Validation examples of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic
Network Process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, 840–859.
Zanakis, S.H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N., & Dublish, S. (1998) Multi-Attribute Decision
Making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational
Research, 107(3), 507-529.
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.