This paper considers different choices for the optimal data model of train schedule presentation. The authors have suggested three possible models that differ in building principles, of presenting temporal data of the train schedule in Information Systems. Three popular multiple-criteria decision making methods were examined in order to choose the best model. The study presents the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as the most suitable one for comparative evaluation of different data presentation models of the train schedule. In the study, thirteen evaluating criteria are developed which are distributed in three groups: hardware, maintenance and performance. The research is carried out for four different classes of IS: web-based schedule systems, mobile schedule systems, ticket sales systems and rail traffic management systems. MS Excel 2007 was used to display the AHP method; however a visualization tool called conditional formatting has been used to present the most important criteria and the preferred alternatives.
multi-criteria analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process, pairwise comparison, data model, train schedule, results visualization
model: A detailed investigation into the application of interval and relation theory to
the problem of temporal database management. Morgan Kaufmann.
Figueira, J., Mousseau, V., & Roy, B. (2005). ELECTRE Methods. In J. Figueira, S.
Greco, M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys,
(pp133-162). Springer’s International Series, New York: Springer Science &
Business Media, Inc.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and
applications. Berlin, Heidelberg, New-York: Springer Verlag.
Jensen, C. (2000). Temporal Database Management. Dr. techn. thesis, defended on
14.04.2000, Available at: www.cs.auc.dk/~csj/Thesis/
Kopytov, E., Demidovs, V., & Petukhova, N. (2008). Application of temporal
elements in the railway schedule systems. Transport and Telecommunication, 9 (2),
Riga, Latvia, 14–23.
Kopytov, E., Demidovs, V., & Petukhova, N. (2008). Modelling of railway schedule
in temporal databases. Proceedings of the International Conference Modelling of
Business, Industrial and Transport System (MBITS’08), Riga, Latvia, 107–116.
Kopytov, E., Petukhova, N., & Demidovs, V. (2010). Methods for railway schedule
periodicity support in temporal databases. Proceedings of the 9th Joint Conference on
Knowledge-based Software Engineering (JCKBSE’10), Kaunas, Lithuania,
Lootsma, F.A., & Schuijt, H. (1997). The multiplicative AHP, SMART and
ELECTRE in a common context. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6 (4),
Olson, D.L., Fliendner, G., & Currie, K. (1995). Comparison of the REMBRANDT
system with analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operations Research,
82 (3), 522–539.
Roy, ?. (1996). Multi-criteria methodology for decision aiding. Dordrecht : Kluwer
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: planning, priority setting,
resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T.L. (2001). Decision making for leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for
decisions in a complex world. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Tansel, A.U., Clifford, J., & Gadia, S. (1993). Temporal databases: theory, design,
and implementation. Redwood City, CA: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing
Terenziani, P. (2003). Symbolic user-defined periodicity in temporal relational
databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15 (2), 489-509.
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative
study. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.