Published Mar 9, 2023
Mohamed Akhrouf Mahfoudh Derghoum


This article aims to develop a methodology in which alternative projects are prioritized and selected using appropriate methods of multi-criteria decision-making in organizations responsible for managing and developing health infrastructure. This study addresses a particular gap in implementing a systematic methodology for prioritizing and selecting projects in the health sector. The methodology developed proposes an approach based on the AHP multi-criteria decision support method for decision-makers and stakeholders to prioritize and select projects in the health sector. The problem was modeled using the Expert Choice software which allows a good “integration of the decision-maker” in the decision-making process making it possible to intervene in the research and decisions to identify the most efficient and potentially profitable health projects that are useful to the community.

How to Cite

Akhrouf, M., & Derghoum, M. (2023). The USE OF A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION SUPPORT MODEL BASED ON THE AHP METHOD FOR THE SELECTION OF HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 15(1).


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 585 | PDF Downloads 520



Project selection, Health infrastructure projects, multi-criteria decision support, multi-criteria Hierarchy method, AHP decision making, AHP, ExpertChoice Software

Ağaç , G., & Şimşir , İ. (2022). Optimal site selection of a pandemic hospital using a multi-criteria decision-making approach. International Journal of the Analytical Hierarchy Process, 14(1), 1-27. Doi:

Akhrouf, M. (2007). Contribution au développement de systèmes d'aide à la décision multicritère (SADM): une application au diagnostic global d'entreprises. Revue des Réformes économique Set Intégration en économie Mondiale N°2(2007), 73-94.

Al-Shemmeri, T., Al-Kloub, B. &. Pearman, A. (1997). Model choice in multicriteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research, 97(3), 550-560. Doi:

Chatterjee, D. (2013). Potential hospital location selection using AHP: A study in rural India. International Journal of Computer Applications, 71(17), 1-7. Doi:

Chatterjee, K., Hossain, S., & Kar, S. (2018). Prioritization of project proposals in portfolio management using fuzzy AHP. OPSEARCH, 55, 478–501. Doi:

Ciptomulyono, U. (2000). Un modèle d'aide à la sélection des projets : l'intégration de la procédure analyse hiérarchique (AHP) et la programmation mathématique a objectifs multiples. Doctoral Thesis, Universite de Droit, D’Economie et des Sciences, Aix Marseilles.

Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications 38(11), 14336-14345.

Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and software. West Sussex: Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Jurı´k, L., Horňáková, N., Šantavá, E., Cagáňová, D., & Sablik, J. (2022). Application of the AHP method for project selection in the context of sustainable development. Wireless Networks, 28, 893–902. Doi:

Keeney, R., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Cambridge University Press. Doi:

Khan, A., & Ali, Y. (2020). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and analytic network process methods and their applications: a twenty-year review from 2000-2019. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(3), 369-459. Doi:

Kumar, S., & Vaidya, O. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research 169(1), 1-69. Doi:

Ministre de la Santé. (2021). Santé Maghreb.

Mu, E., & Pereyra-Rojas, M. (2018). Practical decision making using Super Decisions v3, an introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Springer. Doi:

OMS. (2022, Mai 26). Tableau de bord de l'OMS sur le coronavirus (COVID-19). WHO:

Pomerol, J.-C., & Barba-Romero, S. (2000). Multicriterion decision in management: principles and practice. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. Doi:

Saaty, T.L. & Saaty, R.W. (2022, 5 11). About SuperDecisions.

Saaty, T. (1984). Décider face à la compléxité. Paris: ESF.

Saaty, T. (1986). Axiomatic foundations of the Analytic Hierarchy process. Management Science, 32(7), 841-855. Doi:

Saaty, T. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback, the analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

Saaty, T., & Forman, E. (2022). Expert Choice. Retrieved May 26, 2021 from ExpertChoice:

Sadi-Nezhad, S. (2017). A state-of-art survey on project selection using MCDM techniques. Journal of Project Management 2(1), 1–10. Doi:

Şahin, T., Ocak, S., Top, M. (2019). Analytic hierarchy process for hospital site selection. Health Policy and Technology, 8(1), 44-45. Doi:

Saracoğlu, B. (2015). An AHP application in the investment selection problem of small hydropower plants in turkey. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 7(2), 211-239. Doi:

Triantaphyllou, E., & Mann, S. (1995). Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, 2(1), 35-44.

Vahidnia, M. H., Alesheikh, A., Alimohammadi, A. (2009). Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(10), 3048-3056. Doi:

Vargas, R. V. (2010). Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to select and prioritize projects in a portfolio. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2010-North America, Washington, DC. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.