APPLYING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS TO OIL SANDS ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE RISK MANAGEMENT

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 20, 2016
Izak Johannes Roux Dr. Christos Makrigeorgis

Abstract

In 2013, oil companies in Alberta, Canada invested $32 billion in new oil-sands projects.  Despite the size of this investment, there is a demonstrable deficiency in the uniformity and understanding of environmental legislation requirements that translate into increased project compliance risks. In this paper, we applied the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to develop a priority list of environmental regulatory compliance risk criteria for oil-sands projects.  AHP belongs to the family of multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques that utilizes a pairwise comparison matrix solicited from subject matter experts (SMEs) in the field as input.  The overall methodology itself consisted of 4 phases: (1) identification of the initial list of N potential environmental compliance risk criteria and verification of these criteria via a pilot survey; (2) formation of a pairwise comparison survey in the form of an N(N-1)/2 comparison matrix based on the verified criteria; (3) administration of the pairwise comparison matrix to a sample of 16 industry-specific SME’s; and (4) the application of the AHP method using SuperDecisions as a tool on the collected sample to rank the identified risk criteria. Our demonstrated results can potentially inform Alberta oil sands industry leaders about the ranking and utility of specific compliance risks as understood by experts and enable a more focused environmental compliance action to help increase legislative and public trust.

How to Cite

Roux, I. J., & Makrigeorgis, D. C. (2016). APPLYING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS TO OIL SANDS ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE RISK MANAGEMENT. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v8i1.304

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 1777 | PDF Downloads 213

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

AHP, Alberta, environment, MCDM, oil sands, project risk criteria, regulatory compliance

References
Akdere, M. (2011). An analysis of decision-making process in organizations: Implications for quality management and systematic practice. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22, 1317-1330. doi:10.1080/14783363.2011.625180

Alberta Environment. (2008). Specified gas-reporting regulation: Alberta environment report on 2007 greenhouse gas emission. Retrieved from
http://www.environment.alberta.ca

Andersen, S., & Mostue, B. A. (2012). Risk analysis and risk management approaches applied to the petroleum industry and their applicability to IO concepts. Safety Science, 50, 2010-2019. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.016

Arimura, T. H., Hibiki, A., & Katayama, H. (2008). Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instrument? A case for environmental management systems. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55, 281-295.
doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.09.002

Aydin, O., & Arslan, G. (2010). Optimal hospital location with fuzzy AHP. The Business Review, Cambridge, 15, 262-268. Retrieved from http://www.jaabc.com/

Beccacece, F., & Borgonovo, E. (2011). Functional ANOVA, ultramodularity and monotonicity: Applications in multiattribute utility theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 210, 326-335. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.08.032

Briggs, C. A., Tolliver, D., & Szmerekovsky, J. (2012). Managing and mitigating the upstream petroleum industry supply chain risks: Leveraging analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Business & Economics Perspectives, 7, 1-20. Retrieved from http://www.iabpad.com/

CAPP, (2010). Responsible Canadian energy oil sands progress report, for the year ended December 31, 2009. Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. Retrieved from http://www.capp.ca

Cherry, M. A., & Sneirson, J. F. (2011). Beyond profit: Rethinking corporate social responsibility and green washing after the BP oil disaster. Tulane Law Review, 85, 983-1038. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1670149

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P.S. (2013). Business research methods (12th ed.). NewYork, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Coskuner, G. (2009). A new process combining cyclic steam stimulation and steam-assisted gravity drainage: Hybrid SAGD. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 48, 8-13. Retrieved from http://www.onepetro.org

Edwards, D., & Darnall, N. (2010). Averting environmental justice claims? The role of environmental management systems. Public Administration Review, 70, 422-433.
doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02156.x

El-Fadel, M., Abi-Esber, L., & Ayash, T. (2009). Managing emissions from highly industrialized areas: Regulatory compliance under uncertainty. Journal Atmospheric Environment, 43, 5015-5026. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.056

Enyinda, C. I., Briggs, C., Obuah, E., & Mbah, C. (2012). Petroleum supply chain risk analysis in a multinational oil firm in Nigeria. Journal of Marketing Development & Competitiveness, 5(7), 37-44. Retrieved from Business Source Complete database. (Accession No. 71666007)

ERCB (2008). ERCB Investigation Report; MEG Energy Corp. steam pipeline failure, license no. P 46441, line no. 001, May 5, 2007. Retrieved from
http://www.ercb.ca/docs/products

ERCB (2011). ERCB report ST98-2011- Alberta’s energy reserves 2011 and supply/demand outlook—Economics. Retrieved from
http://www.ercb.ca/docs/products/STs/

Estévez, R. A., Walshe, T., & Burgman, M. A. (2013). Capturing social impacts for decision‐making: A multicriteria decision analysis perspective. Diversity and Distributions, 19, 608-616. doi:10.1111/ddi.12058

Firestone, J. M. (2006). Risk intelligence metrics: An adaptive metrics center industry report. Executive Information Systems, Inc.

Flammer, C. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 55. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0744 ACAD MANAGE J July 20, 2012 amj.2011.0744

Geng, G., & Wardlaw, R. (2013). Application of multi-criterion decision making analysis to integrated water resources management. Water Resources Management, 27, 3191-3207. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0343-y

George, R. (2012). Sun rise, Suncor, the oil sands and the future of energy. Toronto, Canada: HarperCollins Publishers Ltd.

Goepel, K. D. (2011). AHP-ANP practical applications with pros and cons. Retrieved from http://www.bpmsg.com/ahp-anp-practical-application-slides/

Government of Alberta, (2009). Energy Strategy. Retrieved from http://www.alberta.ca

Government of Alberta, (2010). Alberta’s oil sands. Retrieved from
http://www.oilsands.alberta.ca

Huang, Y.-F., Chen, C.-J., & Chang, H.-H. (2009). A multiple criteria evaluation of creative industries for the cultural creativity center in Taiwan. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 15, 473-496. doi:10.1108/13552550910983031

Huang, I.B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of application and trends. Science of the Total Environment, 409, 3578-3594. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022

Hurley, T., Sadiq, R., & Mazumder, A. (2012). Adaptation and evaluation of the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCME WQI) for use as an effective tool to characterize drinking source water quality. Water Research, 46, 3544-3552. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.061

Ishizaka, A. (2012). Clusters and pivots for evaluating a large number of alternatives in AHP. Pesquisa Operacional, 32, 87-102. doi:10.1590/S0101-74382012005000002

Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 14336-14345.
doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143

Jafari, J., Khorasani, N., & Danehkar, A. (2010). Using environmental sensitivity index (ESI) to assess and manage environmental risks of pipelines in GIS environment: A case study of a near coastline and fragile ecosystem located pipeline. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 44, 1101-1111. Retrieved from
http://waset.org/journals/waset/

Jajimoggala, S., & Karri, R. R. (2013). Decision making model for material selection using a hybrid MCDM technique. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 6, 144-159. doi:10.1504/IJADS.2013.053273

McCarthy, S. (2010, Dec, 21). Government’s vow to overhaul environmental monitoring of oil sands development. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from
http://www.theglobeandmail.com

Mohebati, M. H., Maini, B.B., & Harding, T.G. (2010, October). Optimization of hydrocarbon additives with steam in SAGD for three major Canadian oil sands deposits. Paper presented at Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers Calgary, Alberta, Canada. doi:10.2118/138151-MS

Nicholls, T. (2010, August). The oil sands' environmental tests. Petroleum Economist. Retrieved from http://www.petroleum-economist.com

Owen, N. A., Inderwildi, O. R., & King, D. A. (2010). The status of conventional world oil reserves—Hype or cause for concern? Energy Policy, 38, 4743-4749.
doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.026

Podvezko, V., Mitkus, S., & Trinkūnienė, E. (2010). Complex evaluation of contracts for construction. Journal of Civil Engineering & Management, 16, 287-297.
doi:10.3846/jcem.2010.33

Pollard, S. T. (2009). Contributions to resource and environmental risk management. (Doctoral dissertation). Cranfield University, UK. Retrieved from
http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/4563

Rasmussen, M. (2009). Foundations of GRC: Streamlining compliance. Corporate Integrity, LLC. Retrieved from http://www.sap.com/sapbusinessobjects/grc

Saaty, R. W. (2003). Decision making in complex environments. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for decision making and the Analytical Network Process (ANP) for decision making with dependence and feedback. Pittsburgh, PA: SuperDecisions.

Saaty, T. L. (2006). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytical hierarchy process, Vol. VI of the AHP Series. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.

Saaty, T. L., & Sagir, M. (2009). Extending the measurement of tangibles to intangibles. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 8, 7-27. doi:10.1142/S0219622009003247

Stewart, B., Archer, J., & Trynacity, K. (2010, June 25). Syncrude guilty in Alberta duck deaths. CBC News. Retrieved from
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/story/2010/06/25/edmonton-syncrude-duck-trial.

Stoklasa, J., Jandová, V., & Talasová, J. (2013). Weak consistency in Saaty's AHP - evaluating creative work outcomes of Czech art colleges. Neural Network World, 23, 61-77. Retrieved from http://www.nnw.cz/

Wagner, J., & Armstrong, K. (2010). Managing environmental and social risks in international oil and gas projects: Perspectives on compliance. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 3, 140-165. doi:10.1093/jwelb/jwq002
Section
Articles