Published Dec 6, 2018
Predrag Miroslav Mimovic http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0323-8033 Kristina Budimčević Aleksandra Marcikić-Horvat


Over the past decade, the airline industry has undergone a number of changes thanks to accelerated technological progress, changes in consumer preferences and turbulent political events. Bearing in mind the dynamic development of the airline industry, the concept of performance evaluation has been given increasing importance. Therefore, there is a need to further explore the defined terms and relations in order to properly respond to the changes that have occurred. Using the models of multi-criteria analysis, it is possible to perform a comprehensive assessment of an airline’s performance. Accordingly, the study used the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in order to evaluate the performance of three Middle East airlines, Emirates, Etihad and Qatar Airways, with the goal of improving the service quality and customer satisfaction. For the purpose of conducting a comprehensive analysis, besides the AHP model, statistical non-parametric tests were used as well, in order to examine the preference of tangible and intangible components of service quality.


Download data is not yet available.



multicriteria analysis and decision making, performance evaluation of the airlines, quality of service, customer satisfaction, Analytic Hierarchy Process

Armstrong, M., Murlis, H. (2007). Reward management: A handbook of remuneration strategy and practice. London: Kogan Page.

Bowen, B., Headley, D., Luedtke, J. (1992). A quantitative methodology for measuring airline quality. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 2(2), 27-33. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15394/jaaer.1992.1063

Budim?evi?, K., Mimovi?, P. (2013). Application of AHP method in the selection process of the optimum destination of Etihad Airways. Economic Themes, 51(3), 499–514.

Bukhari, S.M.F, Ghoneim, A., Dennis, C. & Jamjoom, B. (2013). The antecedents of travellers’ e-satisfaction and intention to buy airline tickets online. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 26(6), 624-641. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2013-0040

Campbell, B. & Vigar-Ellis, D. (2012). The importance of choice attributes and the positions of the airlines within the South African domestic passenger airline industry as perceived by passengers at Durban International Airport. Southern African Business Review, 16(2), 97-115.

Cronin, J.J., Taylor, S.A., (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1252296

De Jager, J.W., Van Zyl, D. (2013). Airline service quality in South Africa and Malaysia – An international customer expectations approach. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 5(11), 752-761.

Ishizaka, A., Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the nalytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336–14345. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143

Kamakura, W.A., Mittal, V., de Rosa, F., Mazzon, J.A., (2002). Assessing the service-profit chain. Marketing Science, 21 (3), 294-317. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.

Massarat, G., Jha, S. (2014). Assessing customer perception of service quality: Comparative study of airlines in UAE. World Review of Business Research, 4(2), 291-303.

Namukasa, J. (2013). The influence of airline service quality on passenger satisfaction and loyalty: The case of Uganda airline industry. The TQM Journal, 25 (5), 520-532. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2012-0092

Park, J., W., Robertson, R., Wu, C., L. (2004). The effect of airline service quality on passengers’ behavioral intentions: a Korean case study. Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, 435-439. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2004.06.001

Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSci.2008.01759

Saaty, T.L., Kearns, K. P. (1985). Analytical planning: The organization of systems, The Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, Vol. IV. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.

Saaty, T.L., Peniwati, K. (2008). Group decision making: Drawing out and reconciling differences. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.

Sipahi, S., Timor, M. (2010). The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: an overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5). Doi: 775-808, https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011043920

Subramanian, N., Ramanathan, R. (2012). A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 138, 215-241. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.036

Surovitskikh, S., Lubbe. B. (2007). Positioning of selected Middle Eastern airlines in the South African business and leisure travel environment. Journal of Air Transport Management, 14(2), 75-81. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2007.12.001

Tangen, S. (2005). Analyzing the requirements of performance measurement systems. Measuring Business Excellence, 9(4), 46-54. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040510634835

Tsaur, S., Chang, T., Yen, C. (2002). The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Management, 23(2), 107-115. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00050-4

Yayla-Kullu, H.M., Tansitpong, P. (2013). A critical evaluation of U.S. airlines’ service quality performance: Lower costs vs. satisfied customers. Journal of Management and Strategy, 4(4), 1-11. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jms.v4n4p1.

Vaidya, O.S., Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic Hierarchy Process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169 (1), 1-29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028