Career selection is one of the most vital and challenging decisions in the life ofÂ
Career selection is one of the most vital and challenging decisions in the life of an individual. In many cases, the individual is not solely responsible for their career choice. In order to address this problem and provide remedial measures, a sample of engineering students was taken from different institutions in Pakistan. Based on the studentâ€™s current and previous academic performance and interest in their projects, a weighted index was constructed with empirical evidence. This index reflects the overall comprehensiveness of the career decision. The study revealed that 57.4% of the students are enrolled because of self-interest, while the remaining have other reasons. Furthermore, it was found that a significant number of students experience poor outcomes because of bad decisions in relation to how they choose their career. Data analysis suggests that the majority of the students who choose their career due to the influence of others show poor performance on the index rating. The reason for the career choice of the students indicates a highly significant ((p-value = 0.003) association. A gamma test is used to determine the direction of the association. The results also indicate a negative trend when there is a shift of career choice from one due to self-interest to one based on the outlook of the career. This research takes into account all of the important factors in career choice, and is particularly useful for guidance counselors of high schools and colleges as it provides a framework for career choice decisions for students. Finally, the researchers propose a decision making criteria and a numerical model for guiding counselors and students.Â
p-value, AHP, Goodness of the career decision, Guidance counselor, Gamma test
Hensen, Jo Alda & Neuman. (1999). Evidence of concurrent predication interest and skill survey CISS. Journal of Career Assesment, 7(3), 239-247. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279900700304
Jones, D. P., & Ewell, P. T. (1987). Accountability in higher education: Meaning and methods. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
Kark, & James, J. (1990). Selection of graduate major: Implications for student recruitment. College and University, 66(1), 35-40.
Kaynama, Shohreh, & Louis, S. (1996). Using consumer behavior and decision model to aid a student in college major. Journal of Marketing of Higher Education, 7(2), 57-73. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J050v07n02_05
Liberatore, & Miller, M. J. (1995). A decision support approach for transport carrier and mode selection. Journal of Business Logistics, 16(2), 85-99.
Oh, H. (2007). Business school students career perceptions and choice decisions. University of Florida: David F. Miller Center for Retailing Education and Research.
Ozgar, C., Strasser, S., Schroeder, D. (1999). Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process to select a college major. Indiana: Valparasio University.
Swann, C, and Henderson, S. (1998). Handbook for the college admissions profession. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Saaty, T.L. (1994). How to make a decision: the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Interfaces, 24(6), 19â€“43. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.24.6.19
Saaty, T.L., 2008. Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
Tame, L. R. (1996). Efficacy expectations and vocational interests as mediators between sex and choice of math/science college majors: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vacational Behavior, 49(3) 77-91. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0044
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.